Cell potency is a cell's ability to differentiate into other cell types.[1][2] The more cell types a cell can differentiate into, the greater its potency. Potency is also described as the gene activation potential within a cell, which like a continuum, begins with totipotency to designate a cell with the most differentiation potential, pluripotency, multipotency, oligopotency, and finally unipotency.

Totipotency
Totipotency (Latin: totipotentia, lit.'ability for all [things]') is the ability of a single cell to divide and produce all of the differentiated cells in an organism. Spores and zygotes are examples of totipotent cells.[3] In the spectrum of cell potency, totipotency represents the cell with the greatest differentiation potential, being able to differentiate into any embryonic cell, as well as any extraembryonic tissue cell. In contrast, pluripotent cells can only differentiate into embryonic cells.[4][5]
A fully differentiated cell can return to a state of totipotency.[6] The conversion to totipotency is complex and not fully understood. In 2011, research revealed that cells may differentiate not into a fully totipotent cell, but instead into a "complex cellular variation" of totipotency.[7]
El modelo de desarrollo humano puede usarse para describir cómo surgen las células totipotentes. [ 8 ] El desarrollo humano comienza cuando un espermatozoide fertiliza un óvulo, y el óvulo fertilizado resultante crea una sola célula totipotente, un cigoto . [ 9 ] En las primeras horas después de la fertilización, este cigoto se divide en células totipotentes idénticas, que luego pueden desarrollarse en cualquiera de las tres capas germinales de un ser humano ( endodermo , mesodermo o ectodermo ), o en células de la placenta ( citotrofoblasto o sincitiotrofoblasto ). Después de alcanzar una etapa de 16 células, las células totipotentes de la mórula se diferencian en células que eventualmente se convertirán en la masa celular interna del blastocisto o en los trofoblastos externos . Aproximadamente cuatro días después de la fertilización, y después de varios ciclos de división celular, estas células totipotentes comienzan a especializarse. La masa celular interna, la fuente de células madre embrionarias , se vuelve pluripotente.
Las investigaciones sobre Caenorhabditis elegans sugieren que múltiples mecanismos, incluida la regulación del ARN , pueden desempeñar un papel en el mantenimiento de la totipotencia en diferentes etapas del desarrollo en algunas especies. [ 10 ] Los trabajos con pez cebra y mamíferos sugieren una interacción adicional entre el miRNA y las proteínas de unión al ARN (RBP) en la determinación de las diferencias del desarrollo. [ 11 ]
Células germinales primordiales
En las células germinales primordiales del ratón , la reprogramación del genoma que conduce a la totipotencia implica la eliminación de las improntas epigenéticas . La reprogramación se facilita mediante la desmetilación activa del ADN que involucra la vía enzimática de reparación por escisión de bases del ADN . [ 12 ] Esta vía implica la eliminación de la metilación de CpG (5mC) en las células germinales primordiales a través de la conversión inicial de 5mC a 5-hidroximetilcitosina (5hmC), una reacción impulsada por altos niveles de las enzimas dioxigenasas TET-1 y TET-2 . [ 13 ]
Pluripotencia

A pluripotent stem cell (Latin: pluripotentia, lit.'ability for many [things]')[14] is a stem cell that has the potential to differentiate into any of the cells of the three germ layers: endoderm (gut, lungs and liver), mesoderm (muscle, skeleton, blood vascular, urogenital, dermis), or ectoderm (nervous, sensory, epidermis), but not into extra-embryonic tissues like the placenta or yolk sac.[15]
Induced pluripotency
Induced pluripotent stem cells, commonly abbreviated as iPS cells or iPSCs, are a type of pluripotent stem cell artificially derived from a non-pluripotent cell, typically an adult somatic cell, by inducing a "forced" expression of certain genes and transcription factors.[16] These transcription factors play a key role in determining the state of these cells and also highlights the fact that these somatic cells do preserve the same genetic information as early embryonic cells.[17] The ability to induce cells into a pluripotent state was initially pioneered in 2006 using mouse fibroblasts and four transcription factors, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc;[18] this technique, called reprogramming, later earned Shinya Yamanaka and John Gurdon the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.[19] This was then followed in 2007 by the successful induction of human iPSCs derived from human dermal fibroblasts using methods similar to those used for the induction of mouse cells.[20] These induced cells exhibit similar traits to those of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) but do not require the use of embryos. Some of the similarities between ESCs and iPSCs include pluripotency, morphology, self-renewal ability, a trait that implies that they can divide and replicate indefinitely, and gene expression.[21]
Epigenetic factors are also thought to be involved in the actual reprogramming of somatic cells in order to induce pluripotency. It has been theorized that certain epigenetic factors might actually work to clear the original somatic epigenetic marks in order to acquire the new epigenetic marks that are part of achieving a pluripotent state. Chromatin is also reorganized in iPSCs and becomes like that found in ESCs in that it is less condensed and therefore more accessible. Euchromatin modifications are also common which is also consistent with the state of euchromatin found in ESCs.[21]
Due to their great similarity to ESCs, the medical and research communities are interested in iPSCs. iPSCs could potentially have the same therapeutic implications and applications as ESCs but without the controversial use of embryos in the process, a topic of great bioethical debate. The induced pluripotency of somatic cells into undifferentiatediPS cells was originally hailed as the end of the controversial use of embryonic stem cells. However, iPSCs were found to be potentially tumorigenic, and, despite advances,[16] were never approved for clinical stage research in the United States until recently. Currently, autologous iPSC-derived dopaminergic progenitor cells are used in trials for treating Parkinson's disease.[22] Setbacks such as low replication rates and early senescence have also been encountered when making iPSCs,[23] hindering their use as ESCs replacements.
Somatic expression of combined transcription factors can directly induce other defined somatic cell fates (transdifferentiation); researchers identified three neural-lineage-specific transcription factors that could directly convert mouse fibroblasts (connective tissue cells) into fully functional neurons.[24] This result challenges the terminal nature of cellular differentiation and the integrity of lineage commitment; and implies that with the proper tools, all cells are totipotent and may form all kinds of tissue.
Some of the possible medical and therapeutic uses for iPSCs derived from patients include their use in cell and tissue transplants without the risk of rejection that is commonly encountered. iPSCs can potentially replace animal models unsuitable as well as in vitro models used for disease research.[25]
Teratoma formation assays

As the continued research and application of ESCs and iPSCs expands in regenerative medicine models, quality checks of test cells are needed. A widely accepted procedure that works for both mammalian ESCs and iPSCs is the teratoma formation assay.[26] A teratoma is a benign (typically) tumor that is characterized by its ability to form the three germ layers: ectoderm (nerves, epithelium), mesoderm (muscle, bone, and cartilage), and endoderm (gut).[26]
A teratoma formation assay is done by injecting test cells that are expected pluripotent cells into various tissues. A few areas include but are not limited to: the kidney capsule, intra-testicular, and intramuscular regions of mice that are immune-deficient.[26][27] Determined pluripotency is characterized by the test cell's ability to form a teratoma that is capable of producing the three distinct germ layers.
While the teratoma formation assay is considered the "gold standard" among researchers, many issues have arisen with the test.[26] One particular issue is the lack of standardization regarding specific details and factors that influence teratoma formation. Areas of concern for standardization are graft sites, age of test organism (typically mice), and the number of cells being injected into the test organism. These assays are also costly and operationally burdensome, and ethical concerns are an issue due to the use of test organisms.[26]
Another issue with this type of testing is the possibility of histological reading errors. Cells that are not completely reprogrammed into iPSCs that form noticeable cell masses, which look similar characteristically to teratomas, may be judged as pluripotent while lacking the three germ layers. The need for tracking of cell lineages and host versus donor cell markings has also been noted. Certain cell preparation materials may induce an inflammatory response or a foreign antigen immune response. These responses may play a role in falsely identifying differentiation of the test cells.[26]

Naive vs. primed pluripotency states
Los hallazgos con respecto a los epiblastos antes y después de la implantación han generado propuestas para clasificar la pluripotencia en dos estados: "ingenuo" y "preparado", que representan el epiblasto pre y postimplantación, respectivamente. [ 28 ] El continuo de ingenuo a preparado está controlado por la reducción de la dimerización de Sox2/Oct4 en los elementos de ADN SoxOct que controlan la pluripotencia ingenua. [ 29 ] Las células madre pluripotentes preparadas de diferentes especies podrían restablecerse al estado ingenuo utilizando un cóctel que contiene Klf4 y Sox2 o "super-Sox", un factor de transcripción quimérico con capacidad mejorada para dimerizarse con Oct4. [ 29 ]
Las células madre basales comúnmente utilizadas en la ciencia, denominadas células madre embrionarias (CME), se derivan de un epiblasto preimplantacional; dicho epiblasto es capaz de generar todo el feto, y una célula del epiblasto puede contribuir a todos los linajes celulares si se inyecta en otro blastocisto. Por otro lado, se pueden observar varias diferencias marcadas entre los epiblastos preimplantacionales y postimplantacionales, como su diferencia en la morfología, en la que el epiblasto después de la implantación cambia su morfología a una forma de copa llamada "cilindro del huevo", así como la alteración cromosómica en la que uno de los cromosomas X se inactiva aleatoriamente en la etapa temprana del cilindro del huevo, conocida como inactivación del cromosoma X. [ 30 ] Durante este desarrollo, las células del epiblasto del cilindro del huevo son dirigidas sistemáticamente por factores de crecimiento de fibroblastos , señalización Wnt y otros factores inductores a través del saco vitelino circundante y el tejido trofoblástico, [ 31 ] de manera que se vuelven instructivamente específicas según la organización espacial. [ 32 ]
Otra diferencia importante es que las células madre del epiblasto postimplantación no pueden contribuir a las quimeras del blastocisto , [ 33 ] lo que las distingue de otras células madre pluripotentes conocidas. Las líneas celulares derivadas de dichos epiblastos postimplantación se denominan células madre derivadas del epiblasto , que se obtuvieron por primera vez en laboratorio en 2007. Tanto las ESC como las EpiSC se derivan de epiblastos, pero en diferentes fases de desarrollo. La pluripotencia permanece intacta en el epiblasto postimplantación, como lo demuestra la expresión conservada de Nanog , Fut4 y Oct-4 en las EpiSC, [ 34 ] hasta la somitogénesis y puede revertirse a mitad de camino mediante la expresión inducida de Oct-4 . [ 35 ]
Native pluripotency in plants

Un-induced pluripotency has been observed in root meristem tissue culture, especially by Kareem et al 2015, Kim et al 2018, and Rosspopoff et al 2017. This pluripotency is regulated by various regulators, including PLETHORA 1 and PLETHORA 2; and PLETHORA 3, PLETHORA 5, and PLETHORA 7, whose expression were found by Kareem to be auxin-provoked. (These are also known as PLT1, PLT2, PLT3, PLT5, PLT7, and expressed by genes of the same names.) As of 2019, this is expected to open up future research into pluripotency in root tissues.[36]
Maintenance of pluripotency state
The maintenance of the pluripotency state relies on a finely balanced network of transcription factors, signaling pathways, and epigenetic regulators that work together to preserve a cell’s capacity for unlimited self-renewal and its potential to differentiate into all cell types. Core transcription factors such as OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG form the central regulatory circuitry that sustains pluripotency by activating genes essential for self-renewal while repressing differentiation signals.[37]
Multipotency

Multipotency is when progenitor cells have the gene activation potential to differentiate into discrete cell types. For example, a hematopoietic stem cell – and this cell type can differentiate itself into several types of blood cell like lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, etc., but it is still ambiguous whether HSC possess the ability to differentiate into brain cells, bone cells or other non-blood cell types.
Research related to multipotent cells suggests that multipotent cells may be capable of conversion into unrelated cell types. In another case, human umbilical cord blood stem cells were converted into human neurons.[38] There is also research on converting multipotent cells into pluripotent cells.[39]
Multipotent cells are found in many, but not all human cell types. Multipotent cells have been found in cord blood,[40] adipose tissue,[41] cardiac cells,[42]bone marrow, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) which are found in the third molar.[43]
MSCs may prove to be a valuable source for stem cells from molars at 8–10 years of age, before adult dental calcification. MSCs can differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes.[44]
Oligopotency
In biology, oligopotency is the ability of progenitor cells to differentiate into a few cell types. It is a degree of potency. Examples of oligopotent stem cells are the lymphoid or myeloid stem cells.[2] A lymphoid cell specifically, can give rise to various blood cells such as B and T cells, however, not to a different blood cell type like a red blood cell.[45] Examples of progenitor cells are vascular stem cells that have the capacity to become both endothelial or smooth muscle cells.
Unipotency
A unipotent cell is a stem cell that has the capacity to differentiate into only one cell type[46]. Unlike pluripotent or multipotent stem cells, which can become many different kinds of cells, unipotent cells can only produce a single mature cell type. Despite this limited differentiation potential, they often have the ability to self-renew, which means they can make more copies of themselves[47]. Unipotent cells are often referred to as precursor cells.

However, the classification of truly unipotent stem cells remains a subject of scientific discussion. Some cells previously labeled as unipotent may instead be progenitor cells. Progenitor cells are cells that are already committed to a specific developmental pathway and do not have a long-term self-renewal ability[48]. This distinction is important because true stem cells must be able to both differentiate and maintain their population over time[49]. As a result, determination of a true unipotent cell can be challenging.
Por ejemplo, antes se creía que los hepatoblastos eran unipotentes. En realidad, son bipotentes porque pueden diferenciarse en hepatocitos o colangiocitos [ 50 ] . Este ejemplo ilustra cómo los avances en la evidencia experimental pueden refinar la clasificación de los tipos celulares.
Nulipotencia
En biología celular, una célula nulipotente es aquella que no tiene capacidad de diferenciarse en ningún otro tipo celular [ 46 ] ( del latín: nullipotentia , lit. ' capacidad para nada ' ). Si bien el término puede usarse para describir células diferenciadas terminalmente (como neuronas , glóbulos rojos , etc.), se usa con mayor frecuencia al referirse al carcinoma embrionario (CE) o a las células madre embrionarias que han perdido su capacidad de diferenciación (generalmente debido a mutaciones genéticas). [ 50 ]
Véase también
Referencias
- ↑ La totipotencia celular fue descubierta por Habertland y el término fue acuñado por Thomas Hund Morgan. Mahla RS (2016). "Aplicaciones de células madre en medicina regenerativa y terapias para enfermedades" . Revista Internacional de Biología Celular . 2016 (7) 6940283. doi : 10.1155/2016/6940283 . PMC 4969512. PMID 27516776 .
- 1 2 Schöler HR (2007). "El potencial de las células madre: un inventario". En Knoepffler M, Schipanski D, Sorgner SL (eds.). Biotecnología humana como desafío social . Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. pág. 28. ISBN 978-0-7546-5755-2.
- ↑ Mitalipov S , Wolf D (2009). "Totipotencia, pluripotencia y reprogramación nuclear". Ingeniería de células madre . Avances en ingeniería bioquímica/biotecnología. Vol. 114. pp. 185– 199. Bibcode : 2009esc..book..185M . doi : 10.1007/10_2008_45 . ISBN 978-3-540-88805-5. PMC 2752493 . PMID 19343304 .
- ↑ Lodish H (2016). Biología celular molecular (8.ª ed.). WH Freeman. págs. 975–977 . ISBN 978-1-319-06774-8.
- ↑ "¿Cuál es la diferencia entre totipotente, pluripotente y multipotente?" .
- ↑ Western P (2009). "Células germinales fetales: logrando el equilibrio entre pluripotencia y diferenciación" . The International Journal of Developmental Biology . 53 ( 2–3 ): 393–409 . doi : 10.1387/ijdb.082671pw . PMID 19412894 .
- ↑ Sugimoto K, Gordon SP, Meyerowitz EM (abril de 2011). "Regeneración en plantas y animales: ¿desdiferenciación, transdiferenciación o simplemente diferenciación?". Trends in Cell Biology . 21 (4): 212– 218. doi : 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.12.004 . PMID 21236679 .
- ↑ Seydoux G, Braun RE (diciembre de 2006). "Camino a la totipotencia: lecciones de las células germinales" . Cell . 127 ( 5): 891– 904. Bibcode : 2006Cell..127..891S . doi : 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.016 . PMID 17129777. S2CID 16988032 .
- ↑ Asch R, Simerly C, Ord T, Ord VA, Schatten G (julio de 1995). "Las etapas en las que se detiene la fertilización humana: configuraciones de microtúbulos y cromosomas en ovocitos inseminados que no lograron completar la fertilización y el desarrollo en humanos". Human Reproduction . 10 (7): 1897–1906 . doi : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136204 . PMID 8583008 .
- ↑ Ciosk R, DePalma M, Priess JR (febrero de 2006). "Los reguladores traslacionales mantienen la totipotencia en la línea germinal de Caenorhabditis elegans". Science . 311 (5762): 851– 853. Bibcode : 2006Sci...311..851C . doi : 10.1126/science.1122491 . PMID 16469927 . S2CID 130017 .
- ↑ Kedde M, Agami R (abril de 2008). "La interacción entre los microARN y las proteínas de unión al ARN determina los procesos de desarrollo" . Cell Cycle . 7 (7): 899– 903. doi : 10.4161/cc.7.7.5644 . PMID 18414021 .
- ↑Hajkova P, Jeffries SJ, Lee C, Miller N, Jackson SP, Surani MA (July 2010). "Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway". Science. 329 (5987): 78–82. Bibcode:2010Sci...329...78H. doi:10.1126/science.1187945. PMC 3863715. PMID 20595612.
- ↑Hackett JA, Sengupta R, Zylicz JJ, Murakami K, Lee C, Down TA, et al. (January 2013). "Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine". Science. 339 (6118): 448–452. Bibcode:2013Sci...339..448H. doi:10.1126/science.1229277. PMC 3847602. PMID 23223451.
- ↑"Biology Online". Biology-Online.org. Retrieved 25 April 2013.
- ↑Binder MD, Hirokawa N, Nobutaka, Windhorst U, eds. (2009). Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-23735-8.
- 12Baker M (6 December 2007). "Adult cells reprogrammed to pluripotency, without tumors". Nature Reports Stem Cells: 1. doi:10.1038/stemcells.2007.124.
- ↑Stadtfeld M, Hochedlinger K (October 2010). "Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications". Genes & Development. 24 (20): 2239–2263. doi:10.1101/gad.1963910. PMC 2956203. PMID 20952534.
- ↑Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (August 2006). "Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors". Cell. 126 (4): 663–676. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. hdl:2433/159777. PMID 16904174. S2CID 1565219.
- ↑"The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2012". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2013. Web. 28 November 2013.
- ↑Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. (November 2007). "Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors". Cell. 131 (5): 861–872. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. hdl:2433/49782. PMID 18035408. S2CID 8531539.
- 12Liang G, Zhang Y (January 2013). "Embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell: an epigenetic perspective". Cell Research. 23 (1): 49–69. doi:10.1038/cr.2012.175. PMC 3541668. PMID 23247625.
- ↑Schweitzer JS, Song B, Herrington TM, Park TY, Lee N, Ko S, et al. (May 2020). "Personalized iPSC-Derived Dopamine Progenitor Cells for Parkinson's Disease". The New England Journal of Medicine. 382 (20): 1926–1932. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915872. PMC 7288982. PMID 32402162.
- ↑Choi C. "Cell-Off: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Fall Short of Potential Found in Embryonic Version". Scientific American. Retrieved 25 April 2013.
- ↑Vierbuchen T, Ostermeier A, Pang ZP, Kokubu Y, Südhof TC, Wernig M (February 2010). "Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors". Nature. 463 (7284): 1035–1041. Bibcode:2010Natur.463.1035V. doi:10.1038/nature08797. PMC 2829121. PMID 20107439.
- ↑Park IH, Lerou PH, Zhao R, Huo H, Daley GQ (2008). "Generation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells". Nature Protocols. 3 (7): 1180–1186. doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.92. PMID 18600223. S2CID 13321484.
- 123456Singh VK, Saini A, Kalsan M, Kumar N, Chandra R (2016). "Describing the Stem Cell Potency: The Various Methods of Functional Assessment and In silico Diagnostics". Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 4: 134. doi:10.3389/fcell.2016.00134. ISSN 2296-634X. PMC 5118841. PMID 27921030.
- ↑Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, Rybak Z (26 February 2019). "Stem cells: past, present, and future". Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 10 (1): 68. doi:10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5. ISSN 1757-6512. PMC 6390367. PMID 30808416.
- ↑Nichols J, Smith A (June 2009). "Naive and primed pluripotent states". Cell Stem Cell. 4 (6): 487–492. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.015. PMID 19497275.
- 12MacCarthy CM, Wu G, Malik V, Menuchin-Lasowski Y, Velychko T, Keshet G, et al. (December 2023). "Highly cooperative chimeric super-SOX induces naive pluripotency across species". Cell Stem Cell. 31 (1): 127–147.e9. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.11.010. PMID 38141611.
- ↑Heard E (June 2004). "Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation". Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 16 (3): 247–255. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2004.03.005. PMID 15145348.
- ↑Beddington RS, Robertson EJ (January 1999). "Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals". Cell. 96 (2): 195–209. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80560-7. PMID 9988215. S2CID 16264083.
- ↑ Lawson KA, Meneses JJ, Pedersen RA (noviembre de 1991). "Análisis clonal del destino del epiblasto durante la formación de la capa germinal en el embrión de ratón". Development . 113 (3): 891– 911. doi : 10.1242/dev.113.3.891 . PMID 1821858 . S2CID 17685207 .
- ↑ Rossant J (febrero de 2008). "Células madre y desarrollo temprano del linaje" . Cell . 132 ( 4): 527– 531. doi : 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.039 . PMID 18295568. S2CID 14128314 .
- ↑ Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW, Rugg-Gunn P, Sun B, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, et al. (julio de 2007). "Derivación de células madre del epiblasto pluripotentes a partir de embriones de mamíferos". Nature . 448 (7150): 191– 195. Bibcode : 2007Natur.448..191B . doi : 10.1038/nature05950 . PMID 17597762 . S2CID 4365390 .
- ↑ Osorno R, Tsakiridis A, Wong F, Cambray N, Economou C, Wilkie R, et al. (julio de 2012). "El desmantelamiento del desarrollo de la pluripotencia se revierte mediante la expresión ectópica de Oct4" . Development . 139 (13): 2288–2298 . doi : 10.1242/dev.078071 . PMC 3367440. PMID 22669820 .
- ↑ Ikeuchi M, Favero DS, Sakamoto Y, Iwase A, Coleman D, Rymen B, et al. (abril de 2019). "Mecanismos moleculares de la regeneración de plantas" . Annual Review of Plant Biology . 70 (1). Annual Reviews : 377–406 . Bibcode : 2019AnRPB..70..377I . doi : 10.1146/ annurev -arplant-050718-100434 . PMID 30786238. S2CID 73498853 .
- ↑Bahrami M, Moghaddam Matin M, Farshchian M, Asadi M, Bahrami AR (April 2021). "Novel function of Nanos2 in expression of innate immunity genes and its probable roles in maintenance of pluripotency state". Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 24 (4). Mashhad University of Medical Sciences: 531–536. doi:10.22038/ijbms.2021.53841.12104. PMID 34094036.
- ↑Giorgetti A, Marchetto MC, Li M, Yu D, Fazzina R, Mu Y, et al. (July 2012). "Cord blood-derived neuronal cells by ectopic expression of Sox2 and c-Myc". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (31): 12556–12561. Bibcode:2012PNAS..10912556G. doi:10.1073/pnas.1209523109. PMC 3412010. PMID 22814375.
- ↑Guan K, Nayernia K, Maier LS, Wagner S, Dressel R, Lee JH, et al. (April 2006). "Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis". Nature. 440 (7088): 1199–1203. Bibcode:2006Natur.440.1199G. doi:10.1038/nature04697. PMID 16565704. S2CID 4350560.
- ↑Zhao Y, Mazzone T (December 2010). "Human cord blood stem cells and the journey to a cure for type 1 diabetes". Autoimmunity Reviews. 10 (2): 103–107. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2010.08.011. PMID 20728583.
- ↑Tallone T, Realini C, Böhmler A, Kornfeld C, Vassalli G, Moccetti T, et al. (April 2011). "Adult human adipose tissue contains several types of multipotent cells". Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 4 (2): 200–210. doi:10.1007/s12265-011-9257-3. PMID 21327755. S2CID 36604144.
- ↑Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, et al. (September 2003). "Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration". Cell. 114 (6): 763–776. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00687-1. PMID 14505575. S2CID 15588806.
- ↑Ohgushi H, Arima N, Taketani T (December 2011). "[Regenerative therapy using allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells]". Nihon Rinsho. Japanese Journal of Clinical Medicine (in Japanese). 69 (12): 2121–2127. PMID 22242308.
- ↑Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V (September 2008). "Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease". Nature Reviews. Immunology. 8 (9): 726–736. Bibcode:2008NatRI...8..726U. doi:10.1038/nri2395. PMID 19172693. S2CID 3347616.
- ↑Ibelgaufts H. "Cytokines & Cells Online Pathfinder Encyclopedia". Retrieved 25 April 2013.
- 12Rosenstraus MJ, Levine AJ (1 June 1979). "Alterations in the developmental potential of embryonal carcinoma cells in mixed aggregates of nullipotent and pluripotent cells". Cell. 17 (2): 337–346. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(79)90160-0. ISSN 0092-8674. PMID 455469.
- ↑Self-renewal - Latest research and news | Nature. (2026, March 23). Nature. https://www.nature.com/subjects/self-renewal
- ↑Joshi, P. A., & Khokha, R. (2012). The mammary stem cell conundrum: is it unipotent or multipotent? Breast Cancer Research, 14(2), 305. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3123
- ↑Tabansky, I., & Stern, J. N. H. (2016). Basics of stem cell biology as applied to the brain. In Research and perspectives in endocrine interactions (pp. 11–24). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41603-8_2
- 12Rosenstraus MJ, Spadoro JP (15 July 1981). "Autonomy of "nullipotent" and pluripotent embryonal carcinoma cells in differentiating aggregates". Developmental Biology. 85 (1): 190–194. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(81)90249-9. ISSN 0012-1606.
[1]
[2][3]
External links
- Blog on treatment therapy using pluripotent stem cells and pluripotent stem cell derived exosomes
- ↑Cite error: The named reference
:1was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ↑Cite error: The named reference
:2was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ↑Cite error: The named reference
:3was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
- Developmental biology
- Cell biology
- Stem cells